|
| Area: South |
| |
| Dug in Year: 2005 |
| Feature Type: burial |
| |
| Related Photo (Click to view larger version in new window) |
|
| |
| Location: |
| |
body appeared in good condition but in fact had been truncated by F.1347. The position of the body, on top of the baby burial and alongside F.1344 suggests that this burial may have occurred at the same time as F.1344.
This theory now discounted as body was originally covered by charnel redeposition while F.1344 was not. The charnel probably came from, amongst others, F.1346. |
| |
| In situ Conservation: Yes |
| Lifted: Yes |
| |
| Feature Relationships: |
| cut by: (Click to view the record) 1347 |
| cuts: (Click to view the record) 2050 |
| |
| Number of Related Diary Entries: 1 |
| |
| Conservation Recorded: No |
| Related Photos: 29 (Opens as a group in a new window) | Buildings: (Click to view the record)
| Spaces: (Click to view the record)
| | No. Of Units in this Feature: 2 (Click here to view unit list) |
|
